The U.S. takeover of Gaza has sparked global controversy. President Donald Trump has now softened his stance on the proposal. Initially, he suggested the U.S. would “take over” and “own” Gaza, transforming it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” His plan involved resettling over two million Palestinian residents in neighboring Arab nations. However, facing widespread international backlash, he has now clarified that the U.S. takeover of Gaza is only a recommendation, not an enforced policy.
Global Opposition to the U.S. Takeover of Gaza
The original proposal was announced during a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It envisioned the U.S. takeover of Gaza, with Palestinians relocated to Egypt and Jordan. This idea faced immediate condemnation from Arab leaders and the United Nations, who labeled it “ethnic cleansing.” Key regional players, including Egypt and Jordan, rejected the plan, making it highly unlikely to succeed.
In response to criticism, Trump clarified on February 21, 2025, that he does not intend to impose the plan unilaterally. This shift reflects a more cautious approach and acknowledges the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Political and Regional Impact
The U.S. takeover of Gaza proposal has also influenced Israeli domestic politics. Some right-wing leaders saw it as a chance to fully occupy Gaza. However, Hamas’s cooperation in hostage exchanges led to an Israeli response, signaling a possible shift toward negotiation instead of renewed conflict. This has sparked debates in Israel over the ethical and political impact of forced population transfers.
Meanwhile, Arab nations are seeking alternative solutions. Leaders from the Gulf states, Egypt, and Jordan have convened to discuss Gaza’s financial and governance challenges. Their goal is to present a unified stance before the emergency Arab League meeting in March.
Trump’s moderated position reflects the complex geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. As the situation unfolds, the international community remains focused on finding a resolution that respects all parties’ rights and aspirations.
